Published 18 December 2019
Summary
In March 2019, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) revealed proposals for amendment of its rules. These proposals have intensified the discussion of transparency and convergence in tribunal rulings. As part of this discussion, we analyze how tribunals approach valuation topics, using country risk premium (CRP) as an example. Our analysis focuses on how tribunals address five questions:
(1) should one include a country risk premium in the discount rate;
(2) what is the appropriate size of the country risk premium;
(3) what is the proper method to calculate the country risk premium;
(4) what is a suitable way to apply the country risk premium to a valuation model; and
(5) should expropriation risk be included as part of the country risk premium?
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
M. Berberian; J. Cohen; E. Grgeta (2019, forthcoming) "Analyzing Country Risk Premium in ICSID Awards"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) December 2019, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
The Investment Protocol to the Agreement Establishing the African Continental Free Trade Area: An Innovative Instrument that Fits Africa's Needs
15 May 2024
A Dynamic Investment Landscape: Türkiyes Shifting Bilateral Investment Treaty Program
14 May 2024
The Carrot, the Stick, and the Wrench: A History of Economic Sanctions and Their Obstacles to International Arbitration
8 May 2024
Treaty Interpretation and Applicable Law in Environmental Investor-State Disputes
6 May 2024
The Power of Investment Arbitral Tribunals to Enjoin Domestic Criminal Proceedings
25 April 2024
Complete listing of Advance publication.